Intelligent Change Control Workflow Design in Vault Quality - Moving Beyond Basic Automation
- Shanmugapriyan Ganesan
- Jan 22
- 3 min read
Change control is a foundational process in Vault Quality that ensures modifications -whether to documents, procedures, systems, or products - are introduced in a controlled, auditable, and risk-appropriate way. Its purpose is simple but critical:
To maintain confidence and traceability whenever a change has the potential to affect quality, compliance, or operations.
Vault Quality implements change control as a connected system of objects and behavior, where lifecycles, workflows, entry actions, and relationships work together to reflect real quality practice - not just a sequence of approvals.

At a high level, change control addresses four core questions:
Why is the change needed?
What will it impact?
Who must evaluate and approve it?
How do we know it was successful?
A strong change control process helps:
maintain regulatory compliance
align quality and business priorities
reduce cycle times and manual coordination
embed decision logic, not just automation
Vault Quality’s design helps teams convert these questions into controlled behavior inside the platform.
Change Control Process

Create Change Control
The process begins when a quality professional creates a Change Control record in Vault Quality - the primary governing object for the change.
This record captures:
Business Justification
Impact and Risk Indicators
Ownership and Responsibilities
Change classification
Risk & Impact Assessment
After the Change Control exists, the planning stage focuses on assessing:
Risk and Impact
Affected products, organizations, or processes
Affected documentation and systems
These assessments feed Vault’s configuration logic (entry actions and workflows). If risk and impact remain disconnected from behavior, the system only records data rather than uses it for decisions.
Entry Action Triggers workflows
Change workflows in Vault Quality are triggered by entry actions on lifecycle state transitions. Entry actions are configured to start the correct workflow based on risk, type, and impact. It also ensures auditability and evidence capture
This allows Vault to respond differently to, for example:
low-risk document updates
system configuration changes
cross-functional regulatory impacts
The result: adaptive automation instead of fixed linear sequences.
Approvals - Purposeful, Not Exhaustive
Approval workflows in Vault are not meant to collect signatures. They are meant to enable decisions at the right time and by the right people.
Conditional logic ensures that:
reviewers relevant to the specific impact are included
unnecessary steps are avoided
loops and bottlenecks are minimized
This keeps the process aligned with real quality decision paths, rather than arbitrary routing.
Document Change Control
A core part of many changes involves documentation - and Vault Quality has explicit support for this through Document Change Control (DCC).
Single-Document Change Control : A Document Change Control record is linked to the document to manage its draft, approval, release, or obsolescence. This ensures the document itself transitions through appropriate states as part of the change.
Multi-Document Change Control : When multiple documents are impacted, The DCC record orchestrates changes across all of them. This keeps document state aligned with the overall change without additional manual coordination.
Document Change Requests - A Parallel Intake Mechanism
In many environments, users first identify a need to revise a document and log a Document Change Request (DCR).
DCRs:
capture grassroots requests for document changes
can be linked to a DCC when a broader change plan is formalized
automatically close when the document reaches an approved or obsolete state
Change Actions - Execution Outside Documentation
Not all change work is about documents. For activities such as:
system configuration updates
process rollouts
equipment changes
Vault uses Change Actions - records linked to the main Change Control that track execution work and responsibilities.
Each Change Action:
has designated owners and approvers
tracks implementation tasks
ensures visibility into execution progress
This avoids mixing execution details into approval workflows and improves accountability.
Verifying Outcomes - Effectiveness Checks
Approval and implementation are not the end. Vault Quality supports Effectiveness Checks that confirm whether the desired outcome of the change was achieved - closing the loop between intention and result.
Effectiveness Checks:
are linked to the Change Control
are often required before closure
provide measurable validation of results
Closure - Controlled and Evidence Driven
Before a Change Control can be closed, Vault ensures:
required approvals are complete
all Document Change Controls are finalized
all Change Actions are complete
Effectiveness Checks (if configured) are completed
This prevents premature closure and ensures a complete quality narrative.

Closing Perspective
Vault Quality’s change control model is more than automation. It is a connected system that reflects real quality practice:
Decisions based on risk and impact
Documents managed in context
Execution traceable and accountable
Outcomes verified and recorded
This approach minimizes manual coordination, reduces cycle times, and enhances quality confidence across the organization, all within a structured, auditable framework that regulators respect.





Comments